Posts Tagged ‘logic’

honesty

20May09

So when people play a game like the Prisoner’s Dilemma, what do they actually do? According to Peter Lunn in Basic Instincts, about half  “co-operate” He mentions how honesty boxes work on a similar principle (see BBC article). Is this a kind of “superationality” at work? – that we know that we’ll get more out [...]


We all know that sometimes it does work like the Prisoner’s Dilemma. Take this Chinese story, Three Monks No Water: Everyone is somehow “forced” to settle for less than the best, even if it is an “equilibrium”.


Yes, it doesn’t correlate with human beings’ actual behaviour. Behavioral economics, the branch of economics that looks at people’s actual economic behaviour, has a well-known example that has basically the same structure as the prisoner’s dilemma. It’s called a public goods game.  Both players get €10. They can keep it, or put it into a [...]


the trap

12May09

… what the whole story is I don’t know, of course. But one of the great things about wikipedia is the links, the “see also”, that sometimes take you off in a new direction. For instance, there’s a link to Adam Curtis’s documentary The Trap: But there was a small problem with Nash’s equations. They [...]


It’s kind of magic, the prisoner’s dilemma. It gets you thingking about how people relate and why (although some people I know don’t like it). Here’s one version. You and your partner either Co-operate or you Defect. You both co-operate -> you get two each. You Defect while he co-operates -> you get three, he [...]


Here’s one I haven’t seen treated from the psychological point of view: the paradox of the heap. Wikipedia calls it the Sorites Paradox, which means the same thing: The name ‘Sorites’ derives from the Greek word for heap. The paradox is so-named because of its original characterization, attributed to Eubulides of Miletus. The paradox goes [...]


logic

01Mar09

Searching for the tourist website for Novaya Zemlya, I came across this from the writings of the Russian psychologist, Alexander Luria. He’s talking about how “nonliterate subjects often failed to perceive the logical relation among parts of a syllogism”… Another syllogism was presented: “In the far north, where ther is snow, all bears are white. [...]



Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.